What can contractors do if they disagree with their CMS evaluation?

When contractors disagree with their CMS evaluation, the appropriate course of action is to file an appeal or request a review. This process allows for a formal mechanism to address any grievances regarding the evaluation, ensuring that contractors can present their case and provide additional information or context that might not have been considered during the initial evaluation.

By undertaking this process, contractors are able to engage in a structured review of their evaluation, potentially leading to a reassessment based on the merits of their appeal. This option underscores the importance of transparency and fairness in the evaluation process, allowing contractors to seek redress if they believe their performance has not been accurately represented.

The other options imply less constructive or effective means for addressing concerns. Making informal complaints lacks the formal structure that an appeal provides and may not lead to any resolution. Accepting the results without question does not advocate for the contractor's interests or address any discrepancies. Changing evaluation scores by reapplying is not a feasible approach; evaluations are typically based on specific criteria and past performance rather than allowing for alterations through reapplication.